Assessment Techniques for Evaluating Student Progress Essay

judicial decision Techniques for Evaluating Student Progress - Essay ExampleWhile formal assessment offers accountability in an education strategy that c alls for measured results, informal assessment is a method acting that can bring about improvement since it gives a savant the ability to evaluate self and to bring in individually how further learning can lead to success.The two major types of formal assessment argon 1) norm-referenced tests and 2) criterion-referenced tests. Both dep decease on a particular proposition standard, but norm is based on a comparison with other students taking the same test, and criterion-referenced tests measure student ability within a tendency of study. The students performance is compargond to an established level of achievement for each task or unit of the curriculum (Rothenbacher & Leconte, 1990). The broad definition of curriculum as it relates to this paper is all the learning planned and guided by the school, whether in groups or individu ally inside or outside the school (Kelly, 1983).This type of assessment depends on order tests, which are administered annually by school districts and provide a ready source of data. These tests are administered across a large number of students for the purpose of canvas individual performance to the rest of the group. Also, because test publishers provide information about the tests reliability and validity, the results are generally accepted by educators and the community. In addition, in a structured classroom setting, students have immediate access to assistance and might enjoy the social environment a formal classroom provides.A.2 Criterion-referenced Assessment This method offers a quick analysis that measures students against a set objective or criterion. It also eliminates competition and because the student is not measured by how his or her peers are doing, self-evaluation can bring about a higher level of self-esteem. Based on standardized testing, a result can be deter mined by a standardized checklist or rubrics, which offers validity within the system. Criterion-referenced assessment might be categorized as either formal or informal.Disadvantages of Formal Assessment Techniques B.1 Norm-referenced Assessment The test results, because they are compared to the results of other students, dont always determine the ability of the individual student. A standardized test is discriminatory because the curve favors high scorers, and lower-scoring students are automatically placed at the bottom. Therefore the actual ability of the test taker is not measured. Standardized tests, especially norm-referenced tests, are the same across all student levels and geographical areas and therefore set up an unrealistic result with the assumption that all students are the same.B.2 Criterion-referenced AssessmentAlthough this system offers more areas of evaluation for individual students, the end result is a standard measurement. Educators sometimes base their evaluati on of a students ability on the overall results instead of looking at an individuals response to assorted units within the curriculum. A set standard, no matter how informal it may seem, is still structured and the